As I was scrolling through my tumblr dashboard early this
month, a link to an article on asexuality in the media caught my eye. For those
who don’t know, an asexual person is, according to the Asexual Visibility and Education Network Wiki, “someone who does
not experience sexual attraction.” Even knowing that it is exceedingly rare for
mass media to acknowledge the existence of asexuality, much less to portray it
accurately, I nevertheless was excited and hopeful that maybe this time would
be different. I was to be sorely disappointed.
I learned that the FOX
T.V. show, House M. D., had aired
an episode on January 23rd featuring asexuality (Asexual News). Already I knew this was not a good
sign. My father had been a fan of
the show for a while, so I was familiar with it. The main character of House is a misanthropic doctor, Gregory
House, who loves nothing more than solving difficult diagnostic cases and insulting
his patients, the hospital staff, and the population at large while proving
they are all liars and hypocrites. One of House’s favorite phrases, and an
apparent theme of the show, is “Everybody lies.”
This episode was no different. House encouraged viewers to distrust asexual people as well. In one
scene, House and his friend, Wilson, discuss the asexual patent and quickly run
through all of the common disbelieving comments about asexuality. House asks if the patient is a “giant
pool of algae,” confusing the asexual orientation with the process of asexual
reproduction (AT&T Uverse Online).
Dr. Wilson informs him asexuality is “a valid sexual orientation,”
according to an article he read, although his tone implies he has doubts as to
whether it is true (AT&T Uverse Online). Next, House tries to explain the fact that the patient
“doesn’t want to have sex,” by guessing that either she is ugly, or her husband
“loves penis enough for both of them” (AT&T Uverse Online). When Wilson tells him that both she and
her husband are asexual, House makes a bet that he can find a medical reason
for their apparent lack of interest in sex (AT&T Uverse Online). By the end
of the episode, he determines that one of them was lying, and the
other one did have a medical condition, meaning the character could be “cured”
of asexuality (Asexual News).
As an asexual person, myself, I think this misrepresentation
is very hurtful. My orientation is not determined by my desirability to others.
It is about what I feel, not what others feel about me. My orientation has
nothing to do with asexual reproduction, or anything you may have learned in
high school biology. I am not
asexual because I “[don’t ] want to have sex,” (Who is to say I don’t?) but
because I am not sexually attracted
to anyone. I am not asexual
because I am broken or need to be “cured.” There is nothing wrong with not
being attracted to anyone. It does
not prevent me from having relationships, having sex, experiencing sexual
arousal or pleasure, or even desiring to have sex. Behavior, arousal, and orientation
are not the same thing. However, even if I did not have sex, feel arousal, or
want to have sex, that would also be all right.
Although I am glad that people from the Asexual Visibility and Education Network and the Asexual Awareness Week Committee are
pushing for accurate portrayals of asexual people in the future, I am
disappointed in the way House handled
this topic in the first place (Asexual News). With its large viewer base, House had a chance to inform people
about asexuality and dispel the common myths, fears, and misconceptions.
Instead, it only reinforced them. I wonder what unfortunate impact this may
have had on an asexual person still trying to figure out hir orientation. I can already guess what negative
impact this probably had on people like my father, who know nothing about
asexuality, and after having seen this show, may never believe me that it is
real.
I saw this episode, and I was very irritated throughout as well! They pretty much dropped the ball at every opportunity. If Wilson had been a stronger ally, or at least one of the people had turned out to be asexual (without a medical reason), I would have been significantly less upset.
ReplyDelete