Lesbian and gay people have come a long way to be seen as
“normal” in our society. In media today, one can find representation of gay
couples on major network television channels (i.e. Modern Family and Glee,
which air on ABC and Fox, respectively). On a much smaller scale, it’s nice to
know that when Peers for Pride monologues include lesbian and gay characters, not
much talk has to happen around the identity, and we can focus on the situation
this queer character finds hir/her/him self in instead. While these particular
identities are still seen as deviant to some people, those outside of the queer
community at least have a general understanding of what it means to be lesbian
or gay, a vital step toward acceptance of a target identity. So why aren’t the
same steps being taken in accepting bisexuality and transgender people? When do
the B and the T get to be considered “normal?”
Even
in Peers for Pride, we see that when a character identifies as an identity
other than lesbian or gay, the facilitation and conversation surrounds the
particular identity, and education around that identity, rather than the unique
situation this queer person finds hir/her/him self in. Education needs to
happen around these identities, there is absolutely no doubt about that.
However, I also believe that it could be effective in bisexual and trans
peoples’ acceptance if more conversations are had around these identities being
present in everyday situations. This is why I appreciate Sam Sanchez’ monologue,
as ze confronts issues of a queer character who identifies as trans. The issues
do not surround hir trans identity however, and instead highlight a situation
that many queer people could find themselves in.
Thanks! : )
ReplyDelete