I believe that conversation and discussion are powerful mediums for teaching
and/or learning from others. And my beliefs are often reinforced by my daily
interactions with peers, professors, baristas, bus drivers, and friends, among many other people.
I was recently reading an article online, provided by the New Haven Independent
and authored by Melissa Bailey, and was very surprised when I read the title: Gay Rights ‘Social Justice Teach-In’ At
Connecticut School Brings In Non-Textbook Education. The article examined a great case exemplifying the power of discussion in the public school setting.
High School in the Community
for Law and Social Justice (HSC), the school featured in the article, is a
teacher-run school that seeks to develop students into critical thinkers,
effective communicators, lifelong learners and responsible citizens. HSC students
engage in an authentic exploration of law, justice, and equity as these topics
apply to their lives, communities, and the world at large.
In the effort to undergo a
broad experimental transformation, the magnet school held an all-day social
justice teach-in, which reinforced the recently adopted law and social justice
themes of HSC.
LGBTQ issues fall under the
branch of social justice causes and for this reason first-year HSC teacher, Tom
James, hosted a workshop on queer issues. James noted that the session in his
classroom proved to be revealing about the queer issues and also the real lives
of the students in the room.
According to the article,
James began his workshop by asking the kids to define some vocabulary:
homophobia, coming out of the closet, and dyke. In the case of the latter, a
student opened up and shouted, “That’s me...I dress like a boy, act like a boy,
I just don’t have balls.” The author pointed out that this student’s
announcement allowed for honest discussion of feelings and phobias in the
classroom and the community-at-large.
James followed with a lesson
designed to teach kids how to act as strong allies to LGBTQ people who are
harassed or discriminated against. He played a homophobic character who often
used the phrase “That’s so gay” to coax his students into positing why he
should not use this offensive language. While his character insisted on using
the word, the students were forced to stand up to him, with one student
exclaiming, “The words you say have effects on other people.” Although very
simple, this statement was (and is) quite powerful. Oftentimes, I notice that
while people superficially understand that their words can harm others, they do
not entirely grasp the reality of the consequences of their actions—especially
in the case of others feelings. I would like to reinforce that sticks and
stones may break my bones AND hate speech and discriminatory remarks will also
break my spirit, heart, and psyche.
The article went on to
discuss how James cross-examined a student who brought up the issue of changing
in the locker room with a gay student. The student mentioned that he would
change in the bathroom stall to avoid that boy “checking [him] out”. While some
peers defended the gay student and mentioned that the reaction was a double
standard, he was unconvinced and did not budge on his stance about feeling uncomfortable
changing with the gay student there.
The author noted that things
really got personal after this comment, as James confessed that he had been in
the locker-room scenario before. In fact, he was the captain of his wrestling
team in high school, when locker-room dynamics were a big concern. He made the
decision to come out of the closet during his junior year. The student who had expressed
his disconcerting experiences in the locker room sounded confused when he
asked, “What do you mean ‘come out of the closet’?” For the students in the
classroom, this was a big shock—finding out that their instructor was queer.
Although I have had instructors
throughout my public school education that identified as queer, they could
never come out to their students. Because the school districts’ were so
narrow-minded and worried what parents would say. Because the students could be
“harmed” by having this type of “indecent interpersonal exposure”. Because
Texas is not as progressive as Connecticut and I grew up in a place where being
queer and enjoying life could not be coupled together.
Following the first
workshop, James initiated a role-play where he attacked someone by calling the
person “gay”. The class at-hand needed no coaxing to defend the gay student
during James’s intolerant rant. Three young men in the class would not allow
James to get away with homophobic diatribes during his locker-room role-play.
This signified to James, and myself, that times may have changed since he (and
I) entered high school. If not, then at the least New Haven is a more
LGBTQ-friendly climate than others. James shared his personal story of coming
out as gay in high school with this class, and they were very receptive. A
young woman in the class confessed to identifying as bisexual. “Its not that
we’re different. We’re still human,” she said.
Peer-to-peer interaction and
positive reinforcement can often be the source to fighting oppression in the
school setting; regardless of whether this includes bullying, name calling, and
verbal or physical harassment. Although I may have not had the worst
experiences in middle school and high school, I am empathetic to all of my
queer comrades who had to deal with horrible middle and high school experiences. I
think that HSC is doing a great thing for their students and the
community-at-large by dissecting social justice issues, namely LGBTQ topics, in
a setting where many people suffer for their idiosyncratic identities. I would
like to see this type of conversation happen in more school settings
around the nation.
Gay Rights 'Social Justice Teach-In" At Connecticut School Brings in Non-Textbook Education
Gay Rights 'Social Justice Teach-In" At Connecticut School Brings in Non-Textbook Education
No comments:
Post a Comment