While more states celebrate
marriage equality there are about 40,000 foreign nationals in same-sex
relationships living the U.S. who, no matter where they live, can’t really take
part in that celebration.
Yes, we have made a significant
change. Yes, we finally have a president who unapologetically recognizes gays
and lesbians. But for all those screaming “Victory!” in their state because
marriage equality is now a thing, I ask, what does equality mean to you?
I feel as we have forgotten
the Defense Against Marriage Act. DOMA signed by President Clinton in 1996
defines marriage between a man and a women and does not require a state to
recognize same-sex marriages. Despite the fact that the law is not being
defended by our current administration, DOMA is still enforced. Which means, I
can go get married in Maryland but the federal court will not recognize my
marriage. Sounds unnecessary?
Not for the 40,000 foreign
nationals in same-sex relationships to whom getting married still means running
a risk of getting separated rather than a life-long togetherness. Unlike,
straight couples where a U.S. citizen or a permanent resident can file for
their spouse’s green card, same-sex couples don’t have that option. In fact, if
attempted, the undocumented spouse may face deportation. That doesn’t seem very equal to me.
Fortunately, President Obama
is already on it trying to grant same-sex couples equal immigration rights.
However, there is of course opposition with ridiculous reasons as to why they
are opposed. David Nakamura and Zachary A. Goldfarb from the Washington Post
report on some of those oppositions in their article titled “In immigration
debate, same-sex marriage comes to the fore”. Republicans fear that this will
kill any chances of a “comprehensible immigration reform”.Some evangelical churches
and religious organization continue to fight against anything dealing with same-sex
marriage by claiming that it will indefinitely ruin the traditional family.
Many now claim that President Obama has to choose between Latinos and gays.
But is this really about either group?
No, this issue shouldn’t be put in the middle of the table as if now
the undocumented straight individuals had to fight the undocumented gays and
lesbians for a right that has been long
overdue to both parties. This is simply about providing the exact same opportunity that
straight couples already had to same-sex couples. Does this mean that if
same-sex couples have equal immigration rights Obama will not push a full
immigration reform? No, why should extending equal rights have anything to do
with writing an immigration reform? Does this mean that if a legally married
spouse wants to petition for a green card for their spouse the traditional
family values will fall apart? NO!
The fact that this issue even has to be discussed clearly shows how
broken the notion of marriage equality really is.
No comments:
Post a Comment